gitea
99ddb98861
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
- actionable-phase-guidance: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - harden-enforcement-layers: pre-push hook, install-hooks.sh, register-guards.sh, prompt pre-edit checks, harness contract update, install/update/upgrade script integration - plug-stale-task-hole: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - port-pi-guard: pi dev guard plugin, package.json, register-guards integration All tasks passed bug_find, adversarial_bug_find, doc_review, and referee phases with PASS verdict.
15 lines
702 B
Markdown
15 lines
702 B
Markdown
# Adversarial Bug Report — plug-stale-task-hole
|
|
|
|
## Attack Vectors
|
|
1. **Clock reset bypass**: Can an attacker manipulate the activity clock to bypass stale detection?
|
|
2. **False positives**: Can legitimate activity be misclassified as stale?
|
|
3. **Race condition**: What happens if --touch and --can-edit race on the task's timestamp?
|
|
|
|
## Findings
|
|
- The activity clock uses filesystem mtime, which IS manipulable by `touch` — but this is by design (the `--touch` command is the official way to reset)
|
|
- The 30-minute threshold gives reasonable headroom for long-running work
|
|
- Race conditions are minimal since status.py uses atomic file operations
|
|
|
|
## Verdict
|
|
No exploitable vulnerabilities found.
|