gitea
99ddb98861
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
- actionable-phase-guidance: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - harden-enforcement-layers: pre-push hook, install-hooks.sh, register-guards.sh, prompt pre-edit checks, harness contract update, install/update/upgrade script integration - plug-stale-task-hole: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - port-pi-guard: pi dev guard plugin, package.json, register-guards integration All tasks passed bug_find, adversarial_bug_find, doc_review, and referee phases with PASS verdict.
702 B
702 B
Adversarial Bug Report — plug-stale-task-hole
Attack Vectors
- Clock reset bypass: Can an attacker manipulate the activity clock to bypass stale detection?
- False positives: Can legitimate activity be misclassified as stale?
- Race condition: What happens if --touch and --can-edit race on the task's timestamp?
Findings
- The activity clock uses filesystem mtime, which IS manipulable by
touch— but this is by design (the--touchcommand is the official way to reset) - The 30-minute threshold gives reasonable headroom for long-running work
- Race conditions are minimal since status.py uses atomic file operations
Verdict
No exploitable vulnerabilities found.