Files
automaton/tasks/complete/fix-verdict-pass-inference/BUG_REPORT.md
T
Lap Tran 4a2301b077
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
Archive completed tasks, add cleanup commands, self-documenting dashboard UI
- Archive 79 completed framework-dev tasks from tasks/ -> tasks/complete/
- status.py: add --cleanup-done and --install-cleanup-schedule commands
- Add scripts/automaton-cleanup.sh for periodic task archiving
- Dashboard: rename 'Background' tab -> 'Agent', 'Cleanup' agent -> 'Completed Task Archiver', remove redundant group headers and pill badges, dim inactive agent placeholders
- .rules.md: add Self-Documenting UI Names rule
- New tests: test_cleanup_done.py, expanded test_app.py and test_task.py
2026-06-24 22:43:33 -04:00

971 B

Bug Report: fix-verdict-pass-inference

Summary

The fix replaces substring search with structured-line parsing, correctly matching the dashboard's approach.

Bugs Found

Bug 1: Substring match within status line value

  • Severity: Low
  • Location: scripts/status.py:316
  • Description: _parse_verdict_status_line() uses label in after_colon.upper() which is a substring match within the status value. A status like ## Status: FAILURE would match FAIL (since "FAIL" in "FAILURE" is True). However, this is consistent with the dashboard's parse_verdict_status() (task.py:82) which has the same pattern, and verdict status values are always exactly "PASS", "FAIL", or "NEEDS_REVIEW" per the referee prompt template.
  • Suggested Fix: Use exact match only: if after_colon.upper() == label. However, this would diverge from the dashboard's behavior and could break existing verdicts with extra text on the status line.

Score

+1 (Low)