Files
automaton/tasks/complete/state-file-enforcement/SPEC.md
T
Lap Tran 4a2301b077
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
Archive completed tasks, add cleanup commands, self-documenting dashboard UI
- Archive 79 completed framework-dev tasks from tasks/ -> tasks/complete/
- status.py: add --cleanup-done and --install-cleanup-schedule commands
- Add scripts/automaton-cleanup.sh for periodic task archiving
- Dashboard: rename 'Background' tab -> 'Agent', 'Cleanup' agent -> 'Completed Task Archiver', remove redundant group headers and pill badges, dim inactive agent placeholders
- .rules.md: add Self-Documenting UI Names rule
- New tests: test_cleanup_done.py, expanded test_app.py and test_task.py
2026-06-24 22:43:33 -04:00

146 lines
9.3 KiB
Markdown

# SPEC: State File Enforcement
## Goal
Replace the fragile "check which artifacts exist" heuristic for determining task phase with an explicit `.state` file that is the single source of truth for a task's current phase.
## Background
Currently, `orchestrate.md` and `workflow.md` determine a task's phase by checking which artifact files exist in the task folder (e.g., "if SPEC.md exists but not DESIGN.md, the task is in research phase"). This is unreliable because:
- Any agent can create any artifact file at any time, bypassing phase ordering
- File-existence checks are ambiguous (e.g., overlapping conditions when multiple artifacts exist)
- There's no authoritative record of what phase a task is in — every agent has to re-derive it
## Requirements
### 1. `.state` file format
- Location: `tasks/{task-name}/.state`
- Content: a phase name (and optional approval status), one of:
- `new`
- `research` / `research:awaiting_approval` / `research:approved`
- `decomposition` / `decomposition:awaiting_approval` / `decomposition:approved`
- `design` / `design:awaiting_approval` / `design:approved`
- `test_design` / `test_design:awaiting_approval` / `test_design:approved`
- `implement`
- `bug_find`
- `adversarial_bug_find`
- `doc_review`
- `referee`
- `complete`
- `human_intervention`
- The base phase name (e.g., `research`) is used for backward compatibility and when approval is not applicable
- The `:awaiting_approval` sub-state means the phase artifact has been produced but not yet approved by the user
- The `:approved` sub-state means the user has given explicit approval to proceed
- Only phases with interactive sign-off requirements use sub-states: research, decomposition, design, test_design
- Phases without sign-off (implement, bug_find, adversarial_bug_find, doc_review, referee) use only the base name
- The file must be written atomically (write to `.state.tmp`, then rename to `.state`) to prevent partial reads
- The file must NOT be listed in task artifact checks — it is metadata, not a deliverable
### 2. State transitions
- Only the Orchestrator (or `status.py`) may write to `.state`
- Phase prompts must READ `.state` to confirm they are in the correct phase before acting
- Transition rules match the existing state machine in `workflow.md`:
- `new` → `research` (when task folder is created)
- `research` → `research:awaiting_approval` (when SPEC.md draft is presented for sign-off)
- `research:awaiting_approval` → `research:approved` (when user says APPROVED)
- `research:approved` → `decomposition` or `design` or `implement` (when SPEC.md is finalized)
- `decomposition` → `decomposition:awaiting_approval` (when DECOMPOSITION.md draft is presented)
- `decomposition:awaiting_approval` → `decomposition:approved` (when user says APPROVED)
- `decomposition:approved` → sub-task research (when DECOMPOSITION.md is finalized)
- `design` → `design:awaiting_approval` (when DESIGN.md draft is presented)
- `design:awaiting_approval` → `design:approved` (when user says APPROVED)
- `design:approved` → `test_design` or `implement` (when DESIGN.md is finalized)
- `test_design` → `test_design:awaiting_approval` (when TEST_PLAN.md draft is presented)
- `test_design:awaiting_approval` → `test_design:approved` (when user says APPROVED)
- `test_design:approved` → `implement` (when TEST_PLAN.md is finalized)
- `implement` → `bug_find` (when IMPLEMENTATION.md is produced — no approval needed)
- `bug_find` → `adversarial_bug_find` (when BUG_REPORT.md is produced — no approval needed)
- `adversarial_bug_find` → `doc_review` (when ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md is produced — no approval needed)
- `doc_review` → `referee` (when DOC_REVIEW.md is produced — no approval needed)
- `referee` → `complete` (when VERDICT.md has PASS)
- `referee` → `human_intervention` (when VERDICT.md has FAIL or NEEDS_REVIEW)
**Approval gate enforcement:**
- `status.py --transition` MUST REFUSE to transition past an `:awaiting_approval` sub-state
- Only `status.py --approve` can move from `:awaiting_approval` to `:approved`
- Only `status.py --transition` from `:approved` can move to the next phase
- This makes sign-off enforceable — an agent cannot skip approval and proceed
### 3. Backward compatibility
- If `.state` exists, it is authoritative
- If `.state` does not exist, fall back to the artifact-based heuristic (current behavior) and write `.state` with the inferred phase
- This ensures existing tasks without `.state` continue to work and get migrated on first access
### 4. Artifact validation rules (enforced by `status.py`)
Each phase has a defined set of artifacts that are ALLOWED and FORBIDDEN in the task folder. These rules are enforced by `status.py --validate-folder` and `status.py --transition`:
**Forbidden artifacts per phase** (artifacts from future phases — must NOT exist):
| Phase | Forbidden artifacts |
|---|---|
| `new` | SPEC.md, DESIGN.md, DECOMPOSITION.md, TEST_PLAN.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `research` | DESIGN.md, DECOMPOSITION.md, TEST_PLAN.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `decomposition` | DESIGN.md, TEST_PLAN.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `design` | DECOMPOSITION.md, TEST_PLAN.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `test_design` | DECOMPOSITION.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `implement` | BUG_REPORT.md, ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `bug_find` | ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md, DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `adversarial_bug_find` | DOC_REVIEW.md, VERDICT.md |
| `doc_review` | VERDICT.md |
| `referee` | (none) |
| `complete` | (none) |
| `human_intervention` | (none) |
**Non-artifact files** are never forbidden: `.state`, `VRAM_CONFIG.md`, `PARENT_SPEC.md`, `REVIEW.md`, `.state.tmp`. These are metadata and can exist at any phase.
**Enforcement**: When `status.py --transition` is called, it must check for forbidden artifacts BEFORE allowing the transition. If forbidden artifacts exist, the transition is refused with a clear error identifying the offending artifacts.
### 5. Orchestrator updates
- Update `prompts/orchestrate.md`:
- State determination section must read `.state` first, falling back to artifact heuristic
- After each phase transition, the Orchestrator must write `.state` with the new phase name
- The `.state` file must be written BEFORE the orchestrator begins executing the next phase
- Update `prompts/workflow.md`:
- Add `.state` as the canonical phase indicator
- Note that artifact-based heuristic is a fallback only
### 5. Phase prompt updates
- Every phase prompt must include a precondition check:
```
Read tasks/{task}/.state. If the phase does not match this prompt's phase, STOP and report.
```
- This is a 2-line addition to each prompt's "Read These Files" section
### 6. Task creation gate
- Task folders MUST be created via `status.py --create-task` (defined in status-script spec)
- A valid task folder has a `.state` file with `new` as the initial phase
- `--validate-folder` checks that task folders have a `.state` file; folders without `.state` were created manually and should be flagged
- `--audit` flags task folders without `.state` as violations: "Task '{task-name}' was created manually (no .state file). Use 'python ~/.automaton/scripts/status.py --create-task' to create tasks properly."
### 7. Artifact integrity
- `.state` is NOT an artifact — it should NOT appear in state determination logic that checks artifact files
- `.state` should be added to `.gitignore` patterns (or documented that it's transient metadata)
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] `.state` file format is specified and documented (including approval sub-states)
- [ ] Approval sub-states defined for research, decomposition, design, test_design
- [ ] Approval transition rules defined (`:awaiting_approval` → `:approved` only via `--approve`)
- [ ] Transition past `:awaiting_approval` without approval is REFUSED by `--transition`
- [ ] Phases without sign-off (implement, bug_find, etc.) use base names only
- [ ] Atomic write mechanism is defined (write-to-tmp-then-rename)
- [ ] Fallback to artifact heuristic when `.state` doesn't exist is specified
- [ ] Forbidden artifacts per phase are defined and documented
- [ ] `status.py --validate-folder` enforces forbidden artifacts
- [ ] `status.py --transition` refuses transitions when forbidden artifacts exist
- [ ] `status.py --validate-folder` flags task folders without `.state` as manually created
- [ ] `status.py --audit` flags manually created task folders
- [ ] `status.py --create-task` is the only valid way to create task folders
- [ ] `orchestrate.md` updated to read/write `.state`
- [ ] `workflow.md` updated to reference `.state` as canonical
- [ ] All phase prompts include `.state` precondition check
- [ ] State transition rules match existing state machine
- [ ] `.state` is excluded from artifact-based state determination
- [ ] Sub-task `.state` files are scoped to sub-task folders
## Non-Goals
- This spec does not cover the `status.py` script (separate task)
- This spec does not cover prompt restructuring with FORBIDDEN sections (separate task)
- This spec does not cover autopilot integration (separate task)