Files
automaton/tasks/framework-self-enforcement/ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md
T
gitea b15b495d2e Close all 10 tasks through full lifecycle (Implementation → Bug Find → Adversarial → Doc Review → Referee)
- Drive all approved tasks to completion with VERDICT.md
- Fix state machine: IMPLEMENTATION.md was never checked in determine_task_state()
- Fix state machine: DOC_REVIEW.md priority wrong (checked after BUG_REPORT)
- Fix board display: approved planning tasks now advance to Design group
- Fix board display: rejected planning tasks move to Blocked group
- Fix path traversal: review API validated task names against ../ injection
- Fix URL encoding: unquote() task names in API path parsing
- Fix comment parsing: robust REVIEW.md read/write, handle falsy comments
- Fix dead code: KanbanBoard class missing COLUMNS and __init__
- Fix inotify: explicit error messages and polling fallback
- Fix review API: validate task names, prevent path traversal
- Update CHANGELOG.md with all changes
2026-06-13 21:09:57 -04:00

675 B

Adversarial Bug Report: Framework Self-Enforcement

Deep Review

Rules in .rules.md are enforceable only if the agent follows them. No automated enforcement exists. The session discipline rule is concrete (with past failure example) which improves compliance.

Potential Issues

  1. Circular startup: system-prompt.md says read .rules.md, .rules.md says check config.md, config.md reference is static — no circular risk.

  2. Rule enforcement gap: The rules are instructions to the agent, not automated checks. An agent that ignores .rules.md will bypass all enforcement.

Verdict: PASS — rules are well-structured, enforcement relies on agent compliance.