Files
automaton/tasks/additive-extension-model/ADVERSARIAL_BUG_REPORT.md
T
gitea b15b495d2e Close all 10 tasks through full lifecycle (Implementation → Bug Find → Adversarial → Doc Review → Referee)
- Drive all approved tasks to completion with VERDICT.md
- Fix state machine: IMPLEMENTATION.md was never checked in determine_task_state()
- Fix state machine: DOC_REVIEW.md priority wrong (checked after BUG_REPORT)
- Fix board display: approved planning tasks now advance to Design group
- Fix board display: rejected planning tasks move to Blocked group
- Fix path traversal: review API validated task names against ../ injection
- Fix URL encoding: unquote() task names in API path parsing
- Fix comment parsing: robust REVIEW.md read/write, handle falsy comments
- Fix dead code: KanbanBoard class missing COLUMNS and __init__
- Fix inotify: explicit error messages and polling fallback
- Fix review API: validate task names, prevent path traversal
- Update CHANGELOG.md with all changes
2026-06-13 21:09:57 -04:00

718 B

Adversarial Bug Report: Additive Extension Model

Deep Review

The global-first read order in orchestrate.md is correct. The extension loading order (after global for prompts/contracts, before global for scripts) makes sense — scripts need pre-processing hooks.

Potential Issues

  1. Extension conflict: If two extensions define the same file, the later one silently wins. No merge logic exists. This is by design (additive overrides), but could confuse users.

  2. Script ordering: Extensions loaded before global scripts (pre-processing). If a global script evolves and the extension was written for an older version, behavior could break silently.

Verdict: PASS — no security or logic flaws.