gitea
99ddb98861
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
- actionable-phase-guidance: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - harden-enforcement-layers: pre-push hook, install-hooks.sh, register-guards.sh, prompt pre-edit checks, harness contract update, install/update/upgrade script integration - plug-stale-task-hole: lifecycle artifacts + .state->complete - port-pi-guard: pi dev guard plugin, package.json, register-guards integration All tasks passed bug_find, adversarial_bug_find, doc_review, and referee phases with PASS verdict.
697 B
697 B
Adversarial Bug Report — actionable-phase-guidance
Attack Vectors
- Empty state: What happens for an unknown/unexpected state value?
- HTML injection: Could guidance text contain user-controlled content that escapes sanitization?
- Empty guidance: Does the frontend handle missing/incomplete guidance gracefully?
Findings
- Unknown states fall through to a generic return — safe, no crash
- Guidance text is static (no user content), so injection is not a concern
- Frontend checks
task.phase_guidancetruthiness before rendering the guidance section — safe
Verdict
No vulnerabilities found. The implementation is defensive against all checked attack vectors.