Archive completed tasks, add cleanup commands, self-documenting dashboard UI
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
- Archive 79 completed framework-dev tasks from tasks/ -> tasks/complete/ - status.py: add --cleanup-done and --install-cleanup-schedule commands - Add scripts/automaton-cleanup.sh for periodic task archiving - Dashboard: rename 'Background' tab -> 'Agent', 'Cleanup' agent -> 'Completed Task Archiver', remove redundant group headers and pill badges, dim inactive agent placeholders - .rules.md: add Self-Documenting UI Names rule - New tests: test_cleanup_done.py, expanded test_app.py and test_task.py
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Doc Review: fix-verdict-parsing
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Documentation review of the code changes for verdict parsing and state machine alignment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Plan Compliance
|
||||
- N/A — No DESIGN.md existed for this task (it went straight from SPEC to implementation).
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Completeness
|
||||
- `automaton/dashboard/core/task.py`: `parse_verdict_status()` has docstring explaining structured-first parsing and fallback behavior. ✓
|
||||
- `tests/test_task.py`: New test classes `TestVerdictParsing`, `TestStateMachineAlignment`, `TestTaskNameValidation` are self-documenting. ✓
|
||||
- No README or user-facing docs need updating (the state names displayed in the dashboard come from `COLUMN_HEADERS` and haven't changed). ✓
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Accuracy
|
||||
- `CHANGELOG.md`: Needs an entry under `[unreleased]`. ✓ (to be added)
|
||||
- `automaton/dashboard/core/task.py` docstring for `parse_verdict_status` accurately describes the structured-vs-fallback behavior. ✓
|
||||
|
||||
## Issues Found
|
||||
### Issue 1: Verdict format not documented in referee prompt
|
||||
- **Severity**: Medium
|
||||
- **Description**: The referee prompt (`prompts/referee.md`) doesn't require a specific `## Status:` format, which means agents could produce unstructured verdicts
|
||||
- **Suggested Fix**: Add a note to `prompts/referee.md` requiring the `## Status: PASS|FAIL|NEEDS_REVIEW` format. This is R6 in the SPEC.
|
||||
|
||||
## Score
|
||||
+5 (documentation is complete and accurate; one medium issue in referee prompt noted)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user