Archive completed tasks, add cleanup commands, self-documenting dashboard UI
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
- Archive 79 completed framework-dev tasks from tasks/ -> tasks/complete/ - status.py: add --cleanup-done and --install-cleanup-schedule commands - Add scripts/automaton-cleanup.sh for periodic task archiving - Dashboard: rename 'Background' tab -> 'Agent', 'Cleanup' agent -> 'Completed Task Archiver', remove redundant group headers and pill badges, dim inactive agent placeholders - .rules.md: add Self-Documenting UI Names rule - New tests: test_cleanup_done.py, expanded test_app.py and test_task.py
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Bug Report: fix-context-sizing
|
||||
|
||||
## Status: NO_BUGS_FOUND
|
||||
|
||||
## Method
|
||||
Static re-read of `vram_detect.py` changes against the SPEC and against pre-existing behaviors. Focused on:
|
||||
1. **Backward compatibility**: non-loop callers must keep prior behavior.
|
||||
2. **Override authority**: `_parse_config_model`'s override flow must still be authoritative in loop mode.
|
||||
3. **Negative-budget propagation**: `max_peak_kb` can now be negative when overhead exceeds budget — does any consumer read it without wrapping in `max(0, ...)`?
|
||||
4. **Exit codes**: `--loop-mode` refuse paths must exit `2`, not `0`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### F1. Non-loop behavior preserved — CONFIRMED SAFE
|
||||
Pre-existing CLI callers (`vram_detect.py` without `--loop-mode`) and dashboard invocations are unaffected. Warning lines are emitted on degraded conditions but exit code stays `0`. Verified by `test_non_loop_mode_does_not_refuse_unknown_model`.
|
||||
|
||||
### F2. Override authority — CONFIRMED SAFE
|
||||
In `detect_model_context`, the `if override_context and override_context != "auto"` branch (line 343-345) returns the override *before* reaching the fallback-return-zero path. So when a user has set `Override context window` in `config.md`, `detect_model_context` returns a positive value and the `--loop-mode` unknown-model refuse never fires. Matches D13 spec.
|
||||
|
||||
### F3. Negative `max_peak_kb` propagation — LOW RISK, OUT OF SCOPE
|
||||
`recommend_context` now returns a negative `max_peak_kb` when `overhead_tokens > recommended_kb`. No current consumer reads it without arithmetic. The dashboard (`automaton/dashboard/__main__.py`) computes its own derived numbers and does not display this value directly. The loop runner (task `add-loop-runner`) must `max(0, available_context_kb)` before scheduling; that's the runner's obligation, not this task's. Acceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
### F4. Exit code correctness — CONFIRMED
|
||||
`--loop-mode` refuse paths call `return 2`. Verified directly: `python3 vram_detect.py --model zzz --loop-mode; echo $?` returns `2`. Support: `test_loop_mode_refuses_unknown_model` writes a regression guard.
|
||||
|
||||
## Bugs Found
|
||||
None.
|
||||
|
||||
## Out of Scope (for downstream tasks)
|
||||
- Loop runner's `max(0, available_context_kb)` wrap (task 3 `add-loop-runner`)
|
||||
- Dashboard showing the new `loop_mode_eligible` field (v1.1 dashboard panel)
|
||||
- Tier 2 cleanup: `last-read-sha` drift detection, etc.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user