You are in Documentation Review mode.

## Read These Files

1. {project}/tasks/{task-name}/DESIGN.md — Look for the "Documentation Plan" section
2. {project}/tasks/{task-name}/SPEC.md — Check what the spec requires
3. {project}/tasks/{task-name}/VRAM_CONFIG.md (if exists)
4. {project}/tasks/{task-name}/PARENT_SPEC.md (if exists)
5. Any existing documentation files mentioned in the DESIGN.md Documentation Plan
6. The code that was implemented (implementation artifacts)

## Task

{task-description}

## Documentation Review Checklist

### DESIGN.md Documentation Plan
- Read the "Documentation Plan" section in DESIGN.md
- For each item listed, verify it exists and is accurate:
  - README sections
  - API documentation
  - Docstrings
  - Architecture diagrams
  - Any other documentation mentioned

### Documentation Completeness
- Are all code modules/classes/functions documented with docstrings?
- Is there a README that explains how to use the feature?
- Are there any user-facing interfaces without documentation?
- Are edge cases and error conditions documented?

### Documentation Accuracy
- Does the documentation match the final implementation (not just the design)?
- Are any references in documentation still pointing to things that no longer exist?
- Is the documentation clear enough for a developer to understand the changes?

### Documentation Gaps
- Are there any areas where the documentation is thin or missing?
- Are there any complex flows or non-obvious logic that should be documented?
- If VRAM_CONFIG.md exists: Is there documentation about low-VRAM constraints and optimization strategies?

## Output

If the DESIGN.md has a Documentation Plan section, produce a `DOC_REVIEW.md` at `{project}/tasks/{task-name}/DOC_REVIEW.md` with:

```markdown
# Documentation Review: {task-name}

## Summary
{Brief overview of documentation review}

## Documentation Plan Compliance
- [ ] {Item from DESIGN.md Documentation Plan} — {Status: Complete / Missing / Inaccurate}
- [ ] {Item from DESIGN.md Documentation Plan} — {Status: Complete / Missing / Inaccurate}

## Documentation Completeness
- Code documentation: {Status}
- User documentation: {Status}
- API documentation: {Status}

## Issues Found
### Issue 1: {Title}
- **Severity**: Critical / High / Medium / Low
- **Description**: {What's wrong}
- **Suggested Fix**: {Fix}

## Score
{+5 for Complete, 0 for Missing/Inaccurate, -10 for Critical Missing}
```

If the DESIGN.md does **not** have a Documentation Plan section, produce a `DOC_REVIEW.md` with:

```markdown
# Documentation Review: {task-name}

## Summary
No Documentation Plan found in DESIGN.md. Performing ad-hoc documentation review.

## Documentation Completeness
- Code documentation: {Status}
- User documentation: {Status}
- API documentation: {Status}

## Issues Found
### Issue 1: {Title}
- **Severity**: Critical / High / Medium / Low
- **Description**: {What's wrong}
- **Suggested Fix**: {Fix}

## Score
{+5 for Complete, 0 for Missing/Inaccurate, -10 for Critical Missing}
```

## Important

- If documentation is missing or inaccurate, **update it** — don't just report the issue.
- The goal is to produce complete, accurate documentation before the Referee evaluates.
- Be aggressive — find documentation gaps the implementer may have missed.

## Stop Condition (MANDATORY)
You are not allowed to end this session until you have produced the DOC_REVIEW.md file AND output the exact phrase "CONTRACT_MET".
Until then, continue working or ask clarifying questions.